Audience
1) Who are the potential target audiences for Marcus Rashford and Kim Kardashian's online content? Try and cover both demographics and psychographics.
Marcus Rashford: C2DE social grades as he targets a working-class audience through his poverty and food campaigning. The 'reformer' or the 'struggler' as he aids those who are less fortunate and are going through difficult times.
Kim Kardashian: C1C2D social grades as she targets a mainstream audience through reality TV and lifestyle content, and therefore also the 'mainstreamer.' However, she also targets audiences of AB social grades through her appealing to consumers who follow high-end fashion and beauty trends, and therefore she also targets the 'aspirer' for the same reason.
2) Marcus Rashford’s online presence is partly driven by his excellent use of social media. How does he use social media to engage with his fans and make them feel part of his brand?
Marcus Rashford uses social media to promote his football career and quote retweeting of brand promotions. He also occasionally replies to fans, however, his presence is less apparent as of now - he has historically used his social media platforms extensively to highlight issues like child food poverty, but these types of posts are over time being seen less and less.
3) What is Instagram engagement rate and what engagement rates do Marcus Rashford and Kim Kardashian have?
Instagram engagement rate acts as a measure of how much audiences engage with posts through interaction (likes, comments, etc). Marcus Rashford previously had an engagement rate of 6% at, which has recently dropped to 3.2% at 11 million followers, following his re-focus into football and boost in followers. Kim Kardashian's engagement rate is much lower at 0.33%, however, she has around 350 million followers, allowing her to reach a huge audience. An engagement rate of 1-3% is considered good, and 6+% is extremely high.
4) Go to Marcus Rashford and Kim Kardashian's X or Instagram account. Find and screenshot/link three posts that show the different aspects of their brand e.g. Relatable person (normal, down to earth), Campaigner (interested in politics), Celebrity (e.g. awards ceremony or fashion), Brand promotion (e.g. selling a product).
Sexualised / Objectified aspect (extremely low-cut clothing)Kim Kardashian:
Footballer / AthleteMarcus Rashford:
Celebrity (Brand promotion)
5) What audience pleasures are provided by Marcus Rashford's online presence? What about Kim Kardashian? Try and apply Blumler and Katz's Uses and Gratifications theory here.
Marcus Rashford:
- Personal Identity: Rashford's entire campaign is centred around his own personal identity of growing up in poverty in a single-parent household, connecting to audiences going through similar situations to his own. He also connects with Black audiences through his own celebration of his heritage.
- Personal Relationships: Rashford builds relationships with audiences through inspirational posts and the premise of his campaign, which connects him to people.
- Surveillance: Rashford provides information on current events concerning his campaigning, such as the state of free school meals, etc.
Kim Kardashian:
- Personal Identity: Although she isn't actually a vegan, she uses her identity as someone on a mostly plant-based diet to promote herself (Beyond Meat), catering towards vegan/vegetarian audiences.
- Personal Relationships: Kim Kardashian builds personal relationships with fans through the 'male gaze' theory - much of her online presence sexualises and objectifies her (e.g. her Kardashian Kloset website builds an obsession around her items of clothing), catering to a largely male audience and building an almost obsessive parasocial relationship.
6) Applying Stuart Hall's Reception theory, what would a preferred and oppositional reading of Marcus Rashford and Kim Kardashian's online presence be?
Preferred reading (people who support Rashford/Kardashian):
"Rashford is a good person because of his political campaigning - he is heavily aiding the working-class in terms of food and poverty. Kardashian is a high-class celebrity presence - her businesses are innovative and she dictates the latest fashion trends."
Oppositional reading (people who criticise Rashford/Kardashian):
"Rashford's political campaigning is less impactful now considering his complete shift back into football. Kardashian heavily sexualises herself and encourages a sexualised view of women in general."
Industries
1) What is Marcus Rashford and Kim Kardashian's net worth and how does their online presence help them to make money?
Marcus Rashford has an estimated net worth of £16 million - he gains money through endorsement deals (e.g. £2m from Nike) and weekly money from being in Manchester United (£300,000 per week, £15.6m per year).
Kim Kardashian has an estimated net worth of $1.7 billion - she gains money through 'The Kardashians' TV show on Hulu and her multiple brands (SKIMS, SKKY Partners).
2) What companies/brands are Rashford and Kardashian associated with? Why might they want to be linked to those celebrities?
Rashford is linked to: Nike, Burberry, Jaguar Land Rover, Coca-Cola among other brands. They might want to be connected to him due to his reputation of a 'working-class hero' gained through his campaigning in food poverty.
Kardashian owns SKIMS and SKKY Partners, and she has been associated with a huge amount of brands, such as BeyondMeat. They might want to be connected to her due to her high-profile presence and popularity, making her extremely influential and allow companies to better market themselves.
3) Research Twitter/X and Instagram. Who owns the companies, how do they make money and how much profit did they make last year?
Twitter/X:
- Twitter was started by Jack Dorsey in 2006.
- Twitter’s revenue is around $3 billion.
- Marcus Rashford has 7m X followers, Kim Kardashian 75m.
- In 2022 Elon Musk bought Twitter for $44 Billion, and he has since added controversial new features and renamed it X.
Instagram:
- Instagram is an image and video sharing site launched in 2010.
- In 2012 it was bought by Facebook for $1 billion. Both are now under a conglomerate called Meta.
- Instagram's revenue in 2023 was $61 billion.
- Marcus Rashford has over 17m Instagram followers, Kim Kardashian 350m.
4) What are the worries about Instagram’s negative effects?
Instagram is seen as damaging to mental health, particularly towards teenage girls. Facebook's own research into Instagram suggested one in three girls felt bad about their bodies and Instagram made this worse, and it is also linked to increased anxiety and depression.
5) How do social media platforms manage online abuse on their platforms and why has Marcus Rashford drawn attention to this? How might this change in the future?
Social media platforms are regulated by Ofcom, who introduced the online safety bill in order to try and prevent threatening posts, and users seeing harmful material. Rashford has drawn attention to this as he receives extreme racial online abuse due to events in his football career - he has drawn attention to why online abuse is such a large issue. This might change in the future as more regulations are implemented by Ofcom.
6) What happened by law in 2022 that changed the way the internet is regulated? Write three changes that this new law may bring in and explain why it is difficult to regulate the internet.
In 2022, the law was changed by the introduction of the Online Safety Bill (carried over in Parliament in April 2022.) It has introduced: enhanced protection for children, stricter rules on illegal content, and more user power to filter the content that they see.
It is extremely difficult to regulate the internet given that it is global, yet governments are only national. Furthermore, any user can publish almost anything instantly - it is impossible to filter this as it is being published, so it must be filtered afterward.