2) Film Industry: Black Widow
3) Film Industry: I, Daniel Blake
Independent films are different to Hollywood blockbusters in that they have a much smaller budget, are usually niche (appeal to a small audience) and are often financially supported by public service broadcasters, film institutions and charity funding. Directors and producers also have much more creative input in independent films, whereas Hollywood blockbusters are normally made in the vision of studio bosses.
I, Daniel Blake is about a 59 year old man who needs help from the state, following an illness. After meeting a single mother who was forced to accept a flat 300 miles away to escape from a homeless hostel, Daniel stands up and protests, leading a "crusade for compassion".
I, Daniel Blake was directed by Ken Loach. This is important as he is a famous left-wing director who is popular in England and France, therefore, the fact he directed the film helps market it to fans of Ken Loach or people who share his political views.
The estimated production budget for 'I, Daniel Blake' was £2 million. It made £11 million at the box office worldwide.
The film regulator in the UK BBFC (British Board of Film Classification). They gave the movie an age rating of 15.
According to the BBFC website, it had "infrequent use of very strong language", and visual and verbal references to prostitution.
I think the film was a success. It made a profit five times larger than its budget (£11 million from a £2 million budget) in comparison to 'Black Widow', which made just over double its budget (around $379 million from box office earnings, plus $60 million from Disney+ - from a budget of $200 million). It received many positive reviews from critics, and won the 'Palme D'or' award from the Cannes Film Festival. On the other hand, 'Black Widow' received a range of reviews - many praised the movie, whilst some were negative. It received some awards too, which is to be expected from a Hollywood Blockbuster. However, considering that 'I, Daniel Blake' was an independent film, the fact that it made such a large profit, received an award and had mostly positive reviews is surprising (in a good way), and, in my opinion, makes it a success.
Grade 8/9 extension tasks
Read this Media Magazine article on the disruptive marketing campaign used to publicise I, Daniel Blake. Media Magazine is an excellent publication aimed at A Level Media students and it's a great resource for GCSE students aiming for the top grades.
Read this Hollywood Reporter interview with executive Alex Hamilton on film marketing - including the I, Daniel Blake grassroots marketing campaign. Why was it successful?
They denied having the premiere in London and instead opted for Newcastle, as it "[wasn't] appropriate". In doing so, the movie reached people who related to the film and, therefore, increased its success. They also did many community screenings and employed regional marketing officers (people responsible for marketing in specific areas), aiding the film in reaching a large audience before it even came out. Furthermore, they worked with a newspaper group called the Trinity Mirror, who helped spread awareness of 'I, Daniel Blake'.
I, Daniel Blake is an A Level Media text for another exam board. Watch Media teacher Mrs Fisher's YouTube lesson on I, Daniel Blake and make notes on the key points she makes.
Production:
Distributors:
Special Effects:
Other:
Conglomerate ownership is when a conglomerate (large company) owns subsidiaries (smaller companies). This links to Black Widow as Disney owns Marvel Studios, who made the film.
The production budget for Black Widow was approximately $200 million (possibly $300 million if the marketing budget is included). It made $379 million at the box office (not including profit from Disney+, which was about $60 million).
It's difficult to have a definitive answer due to the effects of the pandemic. When compared to other movies in the MCU, Black Widow seems to be far behind at the box office. While 'Avengers: Endgame' grossed $2.8 billion on a $400 million budget, Black Widow secured $379 million at a budget of around $300 million. Looking at these statistics at first glance, Black Widow seems to have made little profit. However, considering Covid-19, it may have been a success. It made $80 million on opening weekend, which was the biggest since the start of the pandemic (at that time). This, therefore, could have been considered somewhat of a success, as Marvel still made profit and was able to make more than other movies released around the same time.
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). They give an age rating and content guidance for all films released in the UK.
Black Widow was given a rating of 12A, as it was seen as not too graphic, yet had "moderate violence" and "injury detail". This was important as Marvel had (and still has) a large young audience who may generate a lot of profit.
10) What other interesting details can you pick out of the article about Black Widow marketing? For example, you may want to make a note of some statistics, ratings or how they used TikTok influencers to help promote the film.Audience interaction is heavily important in modern film marketing because it is used a lot less compared to other marketing methods. This makes companies who do use it stand out more. Normally, a Black Widow billboard wouldn't lead to a news article, but in this case it did, as they used a tweet from a fan. Audience interaction helps companies connect with fans directly, strengthening the bond between 'super-fans' and attracting new viewers. In this case specifically, 'Mars saw bw (@yelenatfilms)' posted a follow-up tweet to the billboard, gaining traction andincidentally promoting the movie further.
The article states that popular TikTok influencers collaborated with Disney to promote the movie, cosplaying as certain Disney characters. Due to the pandemic, they also promoted the film on Disney+, allowing audiences to watch it after paying $29.99. The film itself received an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and a 92% viewer rating.
Scarlett Johansson sued Disney as they released Black Widow at cinemas as well as on Disney+. She claimed that her salary was based on the box office performance of the film, which started strong with an $80 million opening weekend, but had a sharp decline. According to exhibitors, the decline was a direct result of the hybrid release, and an exclusive theatrical release would've lead to more profit.
Scarlett Johansson sued over her argument that the performance of the film (caused by the multiplatform release) prevented her from "realising the full benefit of her bargain with Marvel". In my opinion, she is not right to be angry. Her lawsuit is based off her wanting more money, which should be completely unnecessary considering that (most likely) she made millions off of the film. Furthermore, Disney is right when they state that she disregarded the effects of the pandemic. Being able to rent on Disney+ was important for those who couldn't risk going out, yet didn't want to miss out. Her anger seems selfish, and I believe she failed to think about the reasoning behind the multiplatform release before suing.
Audience: 1) What do we know about the Arctic Monkeys audience? Think demographics, psychographics and how they got into the band. Arctic Mo...